Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing a district court does not abuse its discretion when it excludes expert opinions that are “little more than legal conclusions”
• finding exclusion appropriate where expert opinions “were more or less legal conclusions about the facts of the case . . . .”
• “[W]hen the expert opinions are little more than legal conclusions, a district court should not be held to have abused its discretion by excluding such statements [from the summary judgment record].”
• “When the expert opinions are little more than legal conclusions, a district court should not be held to have abused its discretion by excluding such statements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).