California Court of Appeal· 4/20/2000
In Re AC
Citations
- 96 Cal. Rptr. 2d 79
- 80 Cal. App. 4th 994
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he court has an independent interest in ensuring trials are conducted within ethical standards of the profession and that legal proceedings appear fair to all that observe them.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kennedy v. EldridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-12-13· cited 89×
- Sharp v. Next Entertainment Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2008-05-28· cited 32×
- Trans Health Management Inc. v. NunziataDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-12-19· cited 6×
- Pryor v. PryorCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-09-29· cited 2×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 1,962×
- Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1997-05-05· cited 146×
- In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-07-19· cited 134×
- Comden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-04-11· cited 133×
- People v. PeoplesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-01-13· cited 11×
- A.C. v. San Diego County Health & Human Services AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-04-20· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.