Skip to main content
· 4/3/2006

In Re Able Laboratories Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 425 F. Supp. 2d 562
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15863
  • 2006 WL 851638

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to consider a movant’s revised certification alleging a larger financial loss after the 60-day deadline had passed
  • refusing to consider a movant’s revised certification alleging a larger financial loss after the 60-day deadline had passed
  • refusing to consider a movant’s revised certification alleging a larger financial loss after the 60-day deadline had passed
  • finding no evidence that presumptive co-lead plaintiff was under investigation or lied to the court but had there been the court might have reached a difference conclusion
  • allowing two movants, each of whom filed separate motions and certifications within the sixty-day deadline, to unite and be appointed lead plaintiff as a group after the deadline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greenaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.