Skip to main content
· 9/28/2012

In Re Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.

Citations

  • 696 F.3d 1142
  • 104 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1337
  • 2012 WL 4465236
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 20373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • claim term may be defined by implication where patents 14 “repeatedly, consistently, and exclusively” depict embodiments using that definition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Prost, Wallach

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.