In re A.A.V.

Citations

• 2018 Ohio 106

Syllabus

Appellant and Appellee agreed to various modifications to a shared parenting plan involving the parties' child. The trial court, however, had to resolve three issues: (1) the parenting time exchange schedule (2) parenting time during the child's 2017 spring break and (3) which parent should be designated as the residential parent for school purposes. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by modifying the parental exchange schedule. Further, the trial court, though the issue is now moot, did not abuse its discretion by granting Appellee parenting time during the child's 2017 spring break. The trial court, however, did abuse its discretion by not designating either parent as the residential parent for purposes of school attendance. Judgment affirmed, in part, reversed, in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.