In re A.A.R.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 601
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding legal custody of three children to their uncle in Arizona. Mother and Father failed to complete their case plan objectives, which included addressing mental health, drug use, and parenting issues, and granting legal custody to the uncle was in the best interest of the children. Judgments affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- drawing on Szymkowiak to find that seizure of pen guns did not satisfy the “immediately apparent” requirement of plain view doctrine
- “[T]his circuit has vigorously adhered to the requirement that probable cause must be both immediate and apparent.”
- “[T]his circuit has vigorously adhered to the requirement that probable cause must be both immediate and apparent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.