Skip to main content
· 12/8/1988

In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Pappas

Citations

  • 768 P.2d 1161
  • 159 Ariz. 516
  • 23 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 36
  • 1988 Ariz. LEXIS 189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the attoxmey-client privilege exists, in part, to “foster the public’s confidence in the legal profession”
  • misrepresenting extent of assets available for liquidation and then selling remaining assets on liquidation to companies in which he had interest
  • misrepresenting extent of assets available for liquidation and then selling remaining assets on liquidation to companies in which he had interest
  • in determining whether an attorney-client relationship exists at all, focus is on putative client’s reasonable belief
  • “[interests need not be antagonistic, such as between buyer and seller____ [Those] of a general and limited partner always differ or diverge.”
  • “[fjailure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities is a significant aggravating factor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Cameron, Holohan, Moeller, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.