In re A. A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing termination decision that stemmed from automatic review provision in initial disposition order
• court made disposition order so continuance could not have been to gather data for disposition
• juvenile statute does not give court authority to enter disposition order with provision for review in six months; statute provides procedures for review, which court cannot alter
• juvenile statute does not give court authority to enter disposition order with provision for review in six months; statute provides procedures for review, which court cannot alter
• parental rights cannot be transferred to state absent statutory authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re J.T.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-01-10· cited 53×
• In re R.B.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-08-04· cited 36×
• In re D.C., Juvenile
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2012-12-21· cited 31×
• C.V. v. J.M.J.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2001-04-27· cited 25×
• In Re the Termination of Parental Rights of P.A.M.
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1993-09-08· cited 20×
• In re J. S.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1980-09-08· cited 5×
• In re T.L.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1999-01-29· cited 5×
• In re B.B.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-01-15· cited 4×
• Ex Parte CV
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 2001-04-27
• In Re AA
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1975-12-02
• In Re JT
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-01-10
• In Re JS
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1980-09-08
• In Re TL
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1999-01-29