E.D. Pennsylvania· 6/12/1989
In Re 31-33 Corp.
Citations
- 100 B.R. 744
- 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 889
- 1989 WL 63460
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ § 549 appears to be the sole provision addressing avoiding powers of the trustee to avoid or set aside post-petition transfers”
- Section 549 “is the exclusive means by which a trustee may attack post-petition transfers.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: David A. Scholl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Shuman v. Kashkashian (In Re Shuman)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-12-21· cited 25×
- 222 Liberty Associates v. Prescott Forbes Real Estate Corp. (In Re 222 Liberty Associates)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-02-16· cited 21×
- Burtch v. Hydraquip, Inc. (In Re Mushroom Transportation Co.)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-11-12· cited 15×
- In Re Rheam of Indiana, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-02-26· cited 14×
- In Re Providence Television Ltd. PartnershipN.D. Illinois· 1990-03-26· cited 13×
- Michaels v. National Bank of Sussex County (In Re E-Tron Corp.)D. New Jersey· 1992-06-04· cited 12×
- Rosen v. Dahan (In Re Minh Vu Hoang)D. Maryland· 2012-03-09· cited 12×
- Grassmueck v. Zamsky (In Re E Z Feed Cube Co.)D. Oregon· 1991-01-11· cited 10×
- In Re FrickerE.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-06-22· cited 10×
- In Re Schwemmer Hardware Co., Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-08-04· cited 9×
- Burtch v. Ganz (In Re Mushroom Transportation Co.)E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-05-03· cited 8×
- Baehr v. Beasley (In Re Trinsey)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1991-01-07· cited 8×
- Slone v. Anderson (In re Anderson)S.D. Ohio· 2013-09-10· cited 8×
- Deckelbaum v. Cooter, Mangold, Tompert & Chapman, P.L.L.C.D. Maryland· 2001-10-04· cited 5×
- In Re J.E. Jennings, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-06-20· cited 5×
- In Re TM Carlton House Partners, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-12-15· cited 4×
- Rosen v. Dahan (In Re Minh Vu Hoang)D. Maryland· 2011-06-28· cited 4×
- United States Trustee v. Jones (In Re Thornton's Millwork, Inc.)M.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-05-12· cited 3×
- Spradlin v. Khouri (In re Bruner)E.D. Kentucky· 2015-08-10· cited 3×
- Sapir v. Hudson Realty Co. (In Re Rosalind Gardens Associates)S.D. New York· 1993-08-02· cited 1×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re Arkansas Co.Third Circuit· 1986-08-13· cited 56×
- Greene v. Schmukler (In Re De Berry)E.D. New York· 1986-04-22· cited 35×
- Dubuque Packing Co. v. Stonitsch (In Re Isis Foods, Inc.)W.D. Missouri· 1984-01-30· cited 26×
- Vogel v. Russell Transfer, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1988-08-01· cited 26×
- In Re ShepherdE.D. Pennsylvania· 1981-05-08· cited 22×
- Eisenberg v. Bank of New York (In Re Sattler's, Inc.)S.D. New York· 1987-05-01· cited 22×
- In Re Greater Pottstown Community Church of the Evangelical Congregational ChurchE.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-12-17· cited 15×
- Glick v. Brogan (In Re Roberts)D. New Jersey· 1986-02-14· cited 15×
- In Re Channel 2 AssociatesD. New Mexico· 1988-07-14· cited 14×
- DOLA International Corp. v. Bordlemay (In Re DOLA International Corp.)D. Minnesota· 1988-07-25· cited 12×
- In Re TM Carlton House Partners, Ltd.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-12-05· cited 8×
- Franke v. S.M.R.S., Inc. (In Re Burstein-Applebee Co.)W.D. Missouri· 1983-06-22· cited 7×
- Goldstein v. Beeler (In Re Rose)E.D. Missouri· 1982-12-23· cited 5×
- Thomas v. J.P.S. Associates (In Re Majesto Electro Industries, Ltd.)M.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-02-19· cited 5×
- Walter's Disposal Service, Inc. v. Atterbury (In Re Walter's Disposal Service, Inc.)W.D. Missouri· 1986-12-03· cited 5×
- Ganz v. Feiner (In Re Bobroff)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-08-22· cited 4×
- Armstrong v. First American Bank (In Re Haugen Construction Service, Inc.)D. North Dakota· 1988-06-03· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.