In Re 20/20 Sport, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that successful withdrawal of proof of claim restored right to jury trial where debtor’s fraudulent conveyance action did not implicate claims-allowance process and was not integral to structure of debtor-creditor relationships
• allowing party to withdraw Proof of Claim to preserve right to jury trial and stating that “legal prejudice is not visited upon [the debtors] because they might have to try their case to a jury rather than the court”
• “In bankruptcy cases, courts have traditionally analogized a creditor’s claim to a civil complaint, a trustee’s objection to an answer and an adversarial proceeding to a counterclaim.”
• “In bankruptcy cases, courts have traditionally analogized a creditor’s claim to a civil complaint [and] a trustee’s objection to an answer. . . ”
• “In bankruptcy cases, courts have traditionally analogized a creditor’s claim to a civil complaint [and] a trustee’s objection to an answer. . . .”
• “In bankruptcy cases, courts have traditionally analogized a creditor’s claim to a civil complaint [and] a trustee’s objection to an answer. . . ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).