In Re 2007 Novastar Financial Inc., Securits. Lit.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, after denial of his “footnote” conditional request to amend, the plaintiff never filed a motion under Rules 15(a)(2), 59(e), or 60(b), seeking leave to file an amended complaint
• noting that, after denial of his “footnote” conditional request to amend, the plaintiff never filed a motion under Rules 15(a)(2), 59(e), or 60(b), seeking leave to file an amended complaint
• taking “judicial notice of the existence of the internet bubble and its subsequent crash”
• “[I]n order to preserve the right to amend the complaint, a party must submit the proposed amendment along with its motion.”
• “The PSLRA goes beyond the ordinary pleading requirements described in Rules 8(a)(2) and 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.”
• same where party “merely included a footnote at the end of his response to [a] motion to dismiss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).