In Matter of Marriage of Baumgartner and Baumgartner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in not considering the husband's dental practice a marital asset, although it was also the source of money for the husband to pay spousal support
• not inconsistent to award husband his dental practice and also use the dental practice as a source of income for purposes of computing support obligations, since husband's ability to pay these obligations would not be diminished by considering his practice a marital asset
• involving a dental practice awarded to husband

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).