Skip to main content
· 3/4/2009

In Matter of Johnson

Citations

  • 402 B.R. 851
  • 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the decision to close a case calls for a “flexible, case-by-case evaluation” weighing the costs and benefits
  • holding that considering a lack of any objections from creditors, an individual Chapter 11 debtor may close their bankruptcy case prior to discharge to avoid paying quarterly fees to the U.S. Trustee
  • overruling United States trustee’s objection and permitting case to be closed before the debtor’s discharge entered
  • dicta that individual Chapter 11 debtor’s plan need not satisfy the absolute priority rule of 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii)
  • That the debtor had not completed his plan payments or received a discharge did not prevent his case from being fully administered under § 350(a), the case can be closed early to reduce costs and fees being accumulated needlessly.
  • That the debtor had not completed his plan payments or received a discharge did not prevent his case from being fully administered under § 350(a), the case can be closed early to reduce costs and fees being accumulated needlessly.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert E. Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.