In Home Health, Inc., a Minnesotacorporation,appellee v. Donna Shalala, Secretary of Healthand Human Services,appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting explicit distinction in text of statute and regulation that undercuts Secretary’s attempt to treat employee therapists and independent contractor therapists similarly for reimbursement purposes
• finding Secretary’s decision not supported by plain meaning of statute and therefore do not need to address reasonableness argument
• finding Secretary’s interpretation of Medicare provision invalid in part because interpretation which further limited the statutory term “employment relationship” was “not supported by ... the Secretary’s contemporaneous interpretation as reflected in the 1992 regulation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).