In DESIGN v. Lauren Knitwear Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying prejudgment interest where the plaintiff’s recovery provided adequate compensation for the plaintiff and sufficient deterrence to the defendants thereby serving goals of the Copyright Act
• “a notarial or consular acknowledgement is not essential to the validity of any transfer, whether executed in the United States of abroad”
• defendant must first prove “that each category of overhead contributed to the production of the infringing items” and then that it must offer “a fair and acceptable formula for allocating a given portion of overhead to those items”
• delay of two years not unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).