Skip to main content
· 9/18/2009

In Defense of Animals v. United States Department of Agriculture

Citations

  • 656 F. Supp. 2d 68
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding after in camera review that “disputed material fact” existed “as to whether disclosure of document withheld under FOIA Exemption 4 would cause substantial competitive harm”
  • finding actual competition in the human pharmaceutical industry because, like in the antimicrobial animal drug industry, there exists a race “to be the first to get a particular type of drug to market[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard W. Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.