In Defense of Animals v. Oregon Health Sciences University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• public body did not meet its burden to support charge for “review” when record contained no evidence of what was reviewed or of why professional review was required
• “If any of the claimed exemptions applies to a particular record or portion of a record, we need not consider the applicability of other exemptions to that record or por- tion of a record.”
• “If any of the claimed exemptions applies to a particular record or portion of a record, we need not consider the applicability of other exemptions to that record or por- tion of a record.”
• court considered con- tractual provisions and lack of evidence
• court considered contractual provisions and lack of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).