IMPULSORA DE PRODUCTOS SUSTENTABLES, S.A.P.I. DE C.V. v. SENEN DANIEL GARCIA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Practice Book § 13-4 violated where “defendants’ disclosure of their experts discussed the subject matter on which the experts were to testify, the substance and facts of their opinion, and the summary of the grounds for their opinion in general, all encompassing and vague terms”
• continuation of trial to allow for deposition of experts, location of rebuttal experts and deposition of rebuttal experts would cause undue interference with action that had gone on for almost three years
• “the order with which the defendants were required to comply was reasonably clear, and the defendants knew that in complying with the order they had to comply with ... § 13-4 [4]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).