Implement Service, Inc. v. Tecumseh Products Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although a third-party beneficiary could “sue in some circumstances for enforcement of the contract,” a third-party beneficiary “could not be sued on the contract” because third-party beneficiaries “have no contractual obligations, only benefits”
• interpreting Indiana franchise law and holding that a good or service must be rendered to the franchisor and not to a third party in order to constitute an indirect payment of a franchise fee
• interpreting Indiana franchise law and holding that a good or service must be rendered to the franchisor and not to a third party in order to constitute an indirect payment of a franchise fee
• contract claims can only be brought against party or privy to contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).