· 7/31/2009
Imperial Trading Co. v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of America
Citations
- 654 F. Supp. 2d 518
- 80 Fed. R. Serv. 219
- 2009 WL 2382787
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105927
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- excluding expert opinion testimony for, in part, “misstatement[s] of Louisiana law”
- email admissible for “the non-hearsay purpose of demonstrating that defendant was informed of the information contained in the email”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sarah S. Vance
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.