Skip to main content
· 7/31/2009

Imperial Trading Co. v. Travelers Property Cas. Co. of America

Citations

  • 654 F. Supp. 2d 518
  • 80 Fed. R. Serv. 219
  • 2009 WL 2382787
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • excluding expert opinion testimony for, in part, “misstatement[s] of Louisiana law”
  • email admissible for “the non-hearsay purpose of demonstrating that defendant was informed of the information contained in the email”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sarah S. Vance

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.