· 9/7/1993
Imperial Irrigation District v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Citations
- 4 F.3d 774
- 93 Daily Journal DAR 11483
- 23 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21310
- 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6726
- 37 ERC (BNA) 1557
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22515
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that access to public 5 proceedings and records is an indispensable predicate to free expression about the workings of 6 government.”
- dismissal of pro se plaintiff
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Choy, Hug, Leavy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.