Skip to main content
· 9/27/1977

Imperial American Resources Fund, Inc. v. Railroad Commission of Texas

Citations

  • 557 S.W.2d 280
  • 59 Oil & Gas Rep. 553
  • 20 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 513
  • 1977 Tex. LEXIS 275
  • 1977 WL 365219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We do not agree with Imperial that this procedural error requires a remand in the present case. No harm or prejudice has been shown because of the Commission’s failure to give notice”
  • “We do not agree with Imperial that this procedural error requires a remand in the 35 present case. No harm or prejudice has been shown because of the Commission’s failure to give notice.”
  • deeming final orders of the Commission “prima facie valid”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Daniel, Reavley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.