Imperato v. Bruckman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]o the extent ... earlier decisions declined to give extraterritorial effect to [§ 388], they are overruled”
• holding that “[t]o the extent . . . earlier decisions declined to give extraterritorial effect to [§ 388], they are overruled”
• holding § 388 has extra-territorial effect in spite of the statute's apparent restriction to operation of a motor vehicle \in this state\
• all parties involved in accident were New York domiciliaries and automobile was registered in New York
• New York law applicable to accident in North Carolina

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).