IMO the Estate of Gary M. Gusoff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a routine certification by the custodian of a domestic public record ... and a routine attestation to authority and signature ... are not testimonial in nature” (citation omitted)
• holding that documents, even if “prepared for the purposes of litigation,” are not testimonial where they involve “routine cataloguing of an unambiguous factual matter”
• holding that documents, even if “prepared for the purposes of litigation,” are not testimonial where they involve “routine cataloguing of an unambiguous factual matter”
• holding that \a routine certification by the custodian of a domestic public record . . . [is] not testimonial in nature\
• holding that a local law enforcement official deputized as a Special Deputy U.S. Marshal was a “federal law enforcement officer” for the purposes of Rule 41
• holding that \a routine certification by the custodian of a domestic public record . . . and a routine attestation to authority and signature . . . are not testimonial in nature\ for purposes of Crawford

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).