Immobleria Barcanona, CIA, LTDA v. Citibank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant’s alleged representation about its “ability to fund the promised amounts” was not “definite and specific”
• affirming trial court’s dismissal of breach of contract claim where complaint and documents incorporated therein “necessarily defeat” the claim
• dismissing breach of contract claim where agreement at issue lacked basic terms fundamental to the existence of a contract, particularly because it was “wholly unclear what Plaintiffs were bound to do, or not do”
• legal conclusions in a complaint are not entitled to a presumption of validity under Rule 12(b)(6)
• “Plaintiffs’ claims for breach of contract . . . necessarily hinge on the threshold issue of whether a valid contract actually existed between them and the County.”
• “An allegation that a valid contract exists between parties is a legal conclusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).