Skip to main content
· 7/18/1975

IML Freight, Inc. v. Ottosen

Citations

  • 538 P.2d 296
  • 1975 Utah LEXIS 735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding agency may not ‘“adopt rules or regulations which abridge, enlarge, extend or modify the statute’” (quoting State ex rel. McCulloch v. Ashby, 73 N.M. 267, 387 P.2d 588, 590 (1963))
  • agency may not “abridge, enlarge, extend, or modify the statute creating the right or imposing the duty”
  • employees may not recover additional benefits from an employer’s no-fault insurance policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henriod, Ellett, Crockett, Tuckett, Maughan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.