Imhorst v. Burke

Citations

• 7 Daly 54

Syllabus

<p>In an action for conversion of second-hand furniture, the testimony of plaintiff alone as to its value, he not being shown to be an expert and testifying only that he had purchased and knew the original cost of a part of the articles, and that in his opinion one-third off original cost was their value, is insufficient evidence to sustain a finding of the value of the property converted.</p>