Skip to main content
· 7/7/2015

Imhoff Investment, L.L.C. v. Alfoccino, Inc.

Citations

  • 792 F.3d 627
  • 2015 FED App. 0139P
  • 62 Communications Reg. (P&F) 1525
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11617
  • 2015 WL 4079438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a direct challenge at the district court level to “the legitimacy of the FCC’s definition of sender in [Section] 64.1200(f)(10
  • observing that a direct challenge at the district court level to “the legitimacy of the FCC’s definition of sender in [Section] 64.1200(f)(10
  • stating that if a plaintiff does not have standing to bring a case, the court lacks jurisdiction and must dismiss the case
  • explaining that a seller may be held vicariously liable in an action alleging violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) under federal common law principles of agency
  • explaining that a seller may be held vicariously liable in an action alleging violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) under federal common law principles of agency
  • allowing a corporation to bring suit alleging violation of the TCPA’s “junk fax” provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Siler, Moore, Stranch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.