Imelda Contreras De Avilia, Fidel Ocampoocampo, Candelario Escobar De Ocampo, and Cross-Appellants v. Benjamin Civiletti, and Cross-Appellees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that DOS is responsible for administering provisions relating to numerical limits on immigration, such as issuing immigrant visas
• determining there is “no vested right in the issuance of a visa”
• Department of State interpretation of another provision of the 1976 amendments must be sustained “unless there are compelling indications that it is wrong.”
• “Visa applicants have no vested right in the issuance of visas”
• “Visa applicants have no vested right in the issuance of visas”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).