Skip to main content
· 9/26/2007

Imbraguglio v. Bernadas

Citations

  • 964 So. 2d 348
  • 2007 La. LEXIS 2115
  • 2007 WL 2873923

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court’s failure to instruct jury regarding elements of sentence enhancement stat- ute was harmless because first element of statute was established in previous count and second element was established by uncontested and overwhelming evi- dence
  • “[w]hen reviewing [a] challenged jury instruction ... we must adhere to the well settled rule that a charge to the jury is to be considered in its entirety, read as a whole, and judged by its total effect rather than by its individual component parts” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.