Imagine Medispa, LLC v. Transformations, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that allega‐ tions that scores of calls due to the defendants’ conduct caused “annoyance and inconvenience” and were “disrup‐ tive” to the plaintiff’s personal life were sufficient to state a claim for intrusion upon seclusion under West Virginia law
• finding that allega‐ tions that scores of calls due to the defendants’ conduct caused “annoyance and inconvenience” and were “disrup‐ tive” to the plaintiff’s personal life were sufficient to state a claim for intrusion upon seclusion under West Virginia law
• listing West Virginia cases in which courts have permitted tortious interference claims in the context of employment relationships
• “The plaintiffs did not move to amend their complaint to include these new allegations or exhibits, and the court will not consider them for the purposes of resolving the pending motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kenneth Pucillo v. National Credit Systems, Inco
  Seventh Circuit· 2023-04-26· cited 36×
• Solum v. CertainTeed Corp.
  E.D. North Carolina· 2015-10-27· cited 19×

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Erickson v. Pardus
  Supreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 34,635×
• Conley v. Gibson
  Supreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
• Edwards v. City of Goldsboro
  Fourth Circuit· 1999-05-14· cited 2,842×
• Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1971-04-05· cited 1,972×
• Occupy Columbia v. Nikki Haley
  Fourth Circuit· 2013-12-16· cited 361×
• Anderson v. Sara Lee Corp.
  Fourth Circuit· 2007-11-19· cited 317×
• Castrol Inc. v. Pennzoil Company and Pennzoil Products Company
  Third Circuit· 1993-03-03· cited 247×
• Luther Haynes and Dorothy Haynes v. Alfred A. Knopf, Incorporated, and Nicholas Lemann
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-12-17· cited 235×
• Crump v. Beckley Newspapers, Inc.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1984-07-11· cited 201×
• Franks v. Ross
  Fourth Circuit· 2002-12-04· cited 199×
• PBM PRODUCTS, LLC v. Mead Johnson & Co.
  Fourth Circuit· 2011-04-20· cited 191×
• Monroe v. City of Charlottesville, Va.
  Fourth Circuit· 2009-08-31· cited 173×
• Tiernan v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1998-07-21· cited 116×
• South Carolina Dept. Of Health And Environmental Control v. Commerce and Industry Ins. Co.
  Fourth Circuit· 2004-06-08· cited 103×
• Torbett v. Wheeling Dollar Savings & Trust Co.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1984-02-17· cited 97×
• Roach v. Harper
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1958-11-11· cited 51×
• Leidholdt v. L.F.P. Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-10-26· cited 49×
• O'DELL v. Stegall
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2010-11-24· cited 48×