Imagexpo, L.L.C. v. Microsoft Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying summary judgment on marking because “[w]hether [a patentee] consistently marked ‘substantially all’ of the patented products and whether the evidence is credible and reliable, appear to be classic issues for resolution by the trier of fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Microsoft Corp. v. At&t Corp.
  Supreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 214×
• Eolas Technologies Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2005-03-02· cited 62×
• Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v. Snap-On Inc.
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2017-09-22· cited 12×
• Limelight Networks, Inc. v. XO Communications, LLC
  E.D. Virginia· 2017-03-13· cited 3×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Diamond v. Diehr
  Supreme Court· 1981-03-03· cited 498×
• Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1972-05-30· cited 205×
• Amsted Industries Incorporated, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Buckeye Steel Castings Company
  Federal Circuit· 1994-05-24· cited 147×
• Dunlap v. Schofield
  Supreme Court· 1894-03-05· cited 117×
• Standard Havens Products, Inc. v. Gencor Industries, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1992-03-20· cited 113×
• In Re Kuriappan P. Alappat, Edward E. Averill and James G. Larsen
  Federal Circuit· 1994-07-29· cited 101×
• Nike, Inc. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. And Hawe Yue, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1998-03-12· cited 80×
• Aerogroup International, Inc. v. Marlboro Footworks, Ltd.
  S.D. New York· 1997-02-04· cited 17×
• Enpat, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
  E.D. Virginia· 1998-05-22· cited 6×

Other cases named Imagexpo, L.L.C. v. Microsoft Corp.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Imagexpo, L.L.C. v. Microsoft Corp.
  E.D. Virginia· 2003-09-23· cited 4×
• Imagexpo, L.L.C. v. Microsoft Corp.
  E.D. Virginia· 2003-09-11· cited 1×
• Imagexpo, L.L.C. v. Microsoft Corp.
  E.D. Virginia· 2003-07-11