Ilyashov v. Lo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a violation of Rule 615 is a “non-constitutional error[]”
• applying abuse of discretion to the trial court’s failure to sequester expert witnesses
• “Even experts offering opinions based 4 on the facts of the particular case will usually have access to those facts—via depositions, documents (such as medical records), or hypothetical questions— without being present for the testimony of other witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).