Ilori v. CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “threat [that] was never carried out and had no demonstrable impact on plaintiff’s employment” is insufficient to constitute an adverse employment action
• holding that a “threat [that] was never carried out and had no demonstrable impact on plaintiff’s employment” is insufficient to constitute an adverse employment action
• concluding that the plaintiff's constructive discharge claim was timely because both his last day of work and the date of his first letter of resignation fell within the limitations period
• stating that \a failure to promote and a constructive discharge are ways in which a plaintiff can prove an 'adverse employment action' or a 'tangible employment action' \ under the PHRA
• holding a threat to fire did not constitute an adverse employment action because the “threat was never carried out and had no demonstrable impact on plaintiff’s employment”
• granting summary judgment against § 1981 plaintiff who provided no evidence of overtly racial comments or conduct by the defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).