Ilodianya v. Capital One Bank USA NA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that co-defendants do not have an open-ended deadline for satisfying the unanimity requirement
• explaining that, while an unserved defendant does not have to consent to removal, “lack of knowledge [of the status of service on a co-defendant] cannot satisfy the service of process exception to the rule of unanimity”
• explaining that, while an unserved defendant does not have to consent to removal, “lack of 4 knowledge [of the status of service on a co- defendant] cannot satisfy the service of process exception to the rule of unanimity”
• “[W]here a defendant does not consent to removal, the party seeking removal has the burden of proving that an exception to the rule of unanimity applies.”
• “[W]here a defendant does not consent to removal, the party seeking removal has the burden of proving that an exception to the rule of unanimity applies.”
• noting limited exceptions to the rule of unanimity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).