Skip to main content
· 3/15/2007

Illusions—Dallas Private Club, Inc. v. Steen

Citations

  • 482 F.3d 299
  • 2007 WL 764484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statute’s predominant purpose could be determined by considering text and 2 statutory context
  • holding that statute's predominant purpose could be determined by considering text and statutory context
  • holding that statute's predominant purpose could be determined by considering text and statutory context
  • explaining that courts must determine whether substantial interest exists and whether regulation facilitates that interest
  • explaining that courts must determine whether substantial interest exists and whether regulation facilitates that interest
  • explaining that courts must determine whether substantial interest exists and whether regulation facilitates that interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reavley, Stewart, Clement

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.