Illuminatiny Company v. Cochran
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 2514
Syllabus
Motion for summary judgment genuine issue of material fact damages indirect damages reasonable certainty depreciation utility pole. Judgment reversed. The trial court's decision granting summary judgment in favor of utility company was improper when genuine issues of material fact remain with respect to indirect costs and depreciation.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting a due process challenge based on OSHA’s use of general language in a citation for failure to protect staff in a psychiatric hospital
- reviewing an ALJ’s qualification of a workplace-violence expert; Ward v. Bechtel Corp., 102 F.3d 199, 203 (5th Cir. 1997) (recognizing the “hiring two workplace violence experts to conduct a risk assessment”
- “Proving ‘a violation of the General Duty Clause’ requires the Secretary to establish that . . . a feasible means to eliminate or materially reduce the hazard existed.” (quoting SeaWorld of Fla., LLC v. Perez, 748 F.3d 1202, 1207 (D.C. Cir. 2014))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.