Illinois v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Criminal defendant may be excluded because of disruptive behavior
• Criminal defendant may be excluded because of disruptive behavior

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Doby
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-10-03· cited 41×
• State v. Lacey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-12-13· cited 36×
• Cary by and Through Cary v. Oneok, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1997-07-01· cited 30×
• State v. Banks
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1975-03-01· cited 28×
• People v. Palermo
  New York Court of Appeals· 1973-04-25· cited 28×
• People v. Reginald Harris
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1977-12-06· cited 26×
• People v. Staffney
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-02-22· cited 18×
• Collier v. Denato
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1976-11-17· cited 16×
• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1977-11-23· cited 10×
• Jacobsen v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1979-01-15· cited 10×
• State v. Menefee
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-31· cited 10×
• People v. Herrera
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1972-08-30· cited 6×
• Goston v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-03-03· cited 6×
• State v. Spivey
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1973-02-01· cited 3×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Illinois v. Allen
  Supreme Court· 1970-04-06· cited 3,248×