Illinois Power Co. v. Local Union No. 51, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the inference drawn from the evidence “must not be based on - 20 - No. 12-5643 Vander Boegh v. EnergySolutions, Inc., et al. conjecture, speculation, or mere possibility”
• “Under a federal test of the sufficiency of circumstantial evidence, an inference must not be based on conjecture, speculation, or mere possibility.”
• “More significant under traditional causation tests than the 11 question of mere exposure to [asbestos-containing] products is whether the exposure was 12 sufficiently sustained (or frequent
• “More significant under traditional causation tests than the 22 question of mere exposure to [asbestos-containing] products is whether the exposure was 1 sufficiently sustained (or frequent
• “More significant under traditional causation tests than the question of mere exposure to [asbestos-containing] products is whether the exposure was sufficiently sustained (or frequent) and intense to constitute a proximate cause of [the plaintiff’s] mesothelioma.”
• “More 21 significant under traditional causation tests than the question of mere exposure to 22 [asbestos-containing] products is whether the exposure was sufficiently sustained (or 1 frequent) and intense to constitute a proximate cause of [the plaintiff’s] mesothelioma.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).