Illinois Health Maintenance Organization Guaranty Ass'n v. Shapo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the Association’s argument that “a petition for rehearing is unnecessary where an administrative decision is rendered at the highest level of the agency” (emphasis added)
• discussing the Association’s argument that \a petition for rehearing is unnecessary where an administrative decision is rendered at the highest level of the agency\ (emphasis added)
• finding that the plaintiff forfeited its argument that an exception to the exhaustion requirement applied, where the plaintiff failed to raise the issue in its response to the defendant’s motion to dismiss, instead raising it for the first time in its motion for reconsideration
• noting the series of exceptions listed in Castaneda and finding that they do not apply where plaintiff failed to seek rehearing pursuant to section 2402.280(c) of the Administrative Code
• noting the series of exceptions listed in Castaneda and finding that they do not apply where plaintiff 11 No. 1-16-2033 failed to seek rehearing pursuant to section 2402.280(c) of the Administrative Code
• trial court loses jurisdiction to enter substantive orders once a notice of appeal is filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).