· 3/29/1999
Illinois Founders Insurance v. Barnett
Citations
- 710 N.E.2d 28
- 304 Ill. App. 3d 602
- 237 Ill. Dec. 605
- 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the issue of whether the insurer received actual notice of the suit is a question of fact, and \actual notice can arise from a letter or phone call to the insurer from an injured party or an attorney asserting a claim under the insurance policy\
- stating that the issue of whether the insurer received actual notice of the suit is a question of fact, and “actual notice can arise from a letter or phone call to the insurer from an injured party or an attorney asserting a claim under the insurance policy”
- insurer's duty to defend triggered where it received actual notice of the underlying lawsuit within eight days after the occurrence
- “Compliance with the actual notice standard is a question of fact to be determined by the totality of the circumstances.”
- insured's failure to forward a copy of suit and summons to insurer as required by insured's policy did not absolve insurer of duties to defend and indemnify insured
- insured’s failure to forward a copy of suit and summons to insurer as required by insured’s policy did not absolve insurer of duties to defend and indemnify insured
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frossard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.