Illinois Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is also not a legitimate business justification [for antitrust purposes] to suggest that the defendant would be a ‘better’ provider of the particular product or service than its competitors.”
• combined exposure of Panhandle and Trunkline
• combined exposure of Panhandle and Trunkline

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).