Illinois Central Railroad v. Cobb
Citations
- 48 Ill. 402
Syllabus
<p>1. Garnishment—m what eases—railroad company not liable to judgment in process of—-property in transitu and out of the jurisdiction of the court. A railroad company can not be held liable to judgment on the process of garnishment, when, at the time of issuing and serving the writ, the property had left the county, and was in transitu, on its route, consigned to the debtor.</p> <p>Quaere—-Whether objection to such process would exist, in case the property had not left the county.</p> <p>2. Same—answer of garnishee—however insufficient—unless excepted to—will prevail. The answer of a garnishee, however insufficient, will prevail, where no exception, by demurrer or otherwise, has been taken thereto.</p> <p>3. Same—until disproved or contradicted—must be taken as true. The answer of a garnishee, until disproved or contradicted, must be considered as true ; and if the facts stated therein, do not charge him, and such answer is uncoutradicted, he should be discharged.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is not the object of the law to punish sureties, but to fairly compensate beneficiaries. A surety does not occupy the position of a guardian who has committed a wrong, although he is responsible for the loss occasioned by that wrong.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bbeese
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.