Illinois Central R. R. v. Whitworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a pattern of antagonistic actions over a period culminating in adverse action can constitute causal connection for retaliation purposes
• finding untimely claims against one individual were not sufficiently related to the timely claims against other, separate individuals
• “According to some courts, a plaintiff may also demonstrate a causal connection by showing a ‘pattern of antagonism’ over the intervening period.” (quoting Chan v. NYU Downtown Hosp., No. 03-CV-3003, 2004 WL 213024, at (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 3, 2004))
• “An issue of fact is considered ‘genuine’ when a reasonable finder of fact could render a verdict in favor of the non-moving party.”
• “An issue of fact is considered ‘genuine’ when a reasonable finder of fact could render a verdict in favor of the non-moving party”
• “An issue of fact is considered ‘genuine’ when a reasonable finder of fact could render a verdict in favor of the non-moving party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).