Illinois Central R. R. v. Holland's Admr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, “under Daubert, the possibility that a different conclusion could be drawn from [] data does not undercut the reliability of the conclusion that was drawn, as long as the expert has good grounds for the chosen interpretation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).