Illinois Agricultural Holding Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs were not released from the exclusive remedial framework of the CSRA when their claims arose from their federal employment even though the CSRA provided plaintiffs with no remedy
• \It is not relevant that plaintiffs believe the procedures governing their employment relationship were insufficient.\
• “But as Bush and Chilicky make clear, a Bivens remedy is inappropriate where the ‘special factor’ of federal employment exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).