Illingworth v. Nestle U.S.A., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the employee never told his employer about his dyslexia, he failed to satisfy his prima facie burden to prove disability discrimination under the LAD as he could not establish a causal connection between his dyslexia and his termination
• holding that because the employee never told his employer about his dyslexia, he failed to satisfy his prima facie burden to prove disability discrimination under the LAD as he could not establish a causal connection between his dyslexia and his termination
• holding that because the employee never told his employer about his dyslexia, he failed to satisfy his prima facie burden to prove disability discrimination under the LAD as he could not establish a causal connection between his dyslexia and his termination
• granting summary judgment on LAD disability claim where plaintiff’s symptoms were “not sufficiently obvious” to suggest the presence of a disability to his employer, therefore, no knowledge of plaintiff’s disability could be attributed under LAD

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).