Skip to main content
· 9/17/2002

Ilah M. Tinder v. Pinkerton Security

Citations

  • 305 F.3d 728
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 19106
  • 83 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,193
  • 89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1537
  • 2002 WL 31056991

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that employee’s affidavit that she never saw arbitration program documents did not raise triable issue of fact as to existence of agreement to arbitrate that would preclude compelled arbitration
  • concluding that under Wisconsin law, the employee who remained employed beyond the effective date of the policy agreed to arbitrate claims because the policy explicitly stated that remaining employed past the effective date evidenced assent to the terms of the policy
  • stating that a plaintiff’s affidavit stating that she does not remember receiving or reviewing a brochure about arbitration does not raise a genuine issue over whether the brochure was actually sent to her
  • considering what constituted sufficient consideration to support an agreement in Wisconsin to arbitrate between an employer and an at-will employee where the plaintiff sued her former employer for employment discrimination and retaliation under Title VII
  • affidavit with plaintiff’s bare denial of receipt of arbitration notice is insufficient to create genuine issue of material fact
  • plaintiff’s assertion that she did not remember receiving brochure did not raise genuine factual issue as to whether it was distributed to her

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manion, Rovner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.