Ikuno v. Yip

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims for damages against assuming bank for its own acts did not fall within jurisdictional bar of subsection (i
• concluding that claims against the receiver fall within the language of § 1821(d)(13)(D)(i)
• “RTC’s legal position in this litigation is not necessarily conclusive of the receiver’s determination of plaintiff’s claims.”
• purpose of FIRREA's administrative procedure is to \quickly and efficiently resolve claims against a failed institution without resorting to litigation\
• FIRREA’s jurisdictional bar does encompass a claim arising from post receivership actions of the RTC
• Plaintiffs, participants in and beneficiaries of a retirement benefit plan of a failed savings institution, brought action against the RTC for various violations of ERISA. The court held that to the extent that 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(13)(D

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).