Ikossi v. Department of Navy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “lack of precision” in 56(f) affidavit does not make nature of the evidence sought “any less self-evident,” thus finding summary judgment premature and remanding the case to the district court to allow for discovery
• explaining that Morgan “does not suggest that a plaintiff can obtain judicial review of an EEO decision outside the ninety-day period”
• explaining that Morgan “does not suggest that a plaintiff can … raise a hostile work environment claim without first exhausting her administrative remedies”
• considering whether the necessity of the requested evidence was \self-evident\ and otherwise looking beyond the declaration
• applying Hackley and Chap-pell-Johnson in a “mixed case” appeal involving FMLA and Civil Service Reform Act claims
• finding it “self-evident” that deposition of supervisor might provide reveal evidence “at the heart of” a discrimination claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).